With multiple client portals, you can have uniquely branded landing pages for that entity, including logos, colors, introductory info, etc. Additionally, portal access is handled through user permissions, so you need to rely less on group permissions to manage visibility and show/hide items. However, adding multiple client portals does create more complexity for your customers - there are multiple places for your customers to find knowledge articles, services, and general information. Consider carefully what expectations your customers have around branding, access, and UX when requesting services or looking for information.
Will you have multiple departments using TeamDynamix to manage and fulfill requests? For example: HR, Facilities, Admissions. If so, you will likely want to consider having multiple ticketing applications to help intake those requests and keep them separate and scoped to the appropriate department: Tickets are only visible to admins and users who explicitly are given access to the ticketing app, and some branding (e.g. notification templates, email integrations) can be customized for each organization's branding.
Similarly, do you have multiple departments who need to track and manage assets? For example: IT, Facilities, Athletics, Manufacturing. If so, you will likely want to consider having multiple separate asset applications to help provide appropriate access and management of those items.
Resources:
Where will your asset data come from?
Asset Management is often a challenging component for many clients. Not necessarily due to configuration, but because existing asset management processes in an organization can be scattered and disorganized. Information needed for effective asset management may be incomplete or spread across the organization; data may live in spreadsheets owned by different teams or individuals, in standalone databases, ITSM or ITAM apps, endpoint management apps like SCCM, Intune, or JAMF. Or it may not exist at all!
Think about your asset management processes holistically as you consider how data may flow through your organization:
-
What teams, systems, or apps need to work with this data?
-
Do you need to combine data from multiple sources? Does this data need to be cleaned up?
-
If you're bringing asset data into TeamDynamix, where are you getting it from?
-
Do you need to push data back out from TeamDynamix to other systems?
-
Do you need to do a walk-through audit of your physical locations to verify your inventory?
-
Consider your data needs carefully - is this information actually useful? Or is it just going to be low value data that will require additional work to maintain it for little benefit to the organization?
Resources:
Implementation Scope and Go-Live Planning
How much can you realistically accomplish for your phase 1 go-live?
At the start and also ongoing throughout your implementation, be sure that you are appropriately planning and adjusting your scope according to your capability and deadlines. Is what you are planning actually realistic to accomplish for your target deadlines? Have you included slack time to account for unforeseen issues and delays? Or are you being overly optimistic with how quickly you can make decisions or configuration?
Review your planned scope alongside realistic demands on your resources from other projects/areas of your organization, and ensure you are appropriately planning for "unknown unknowns" that you may need to address - other projects, shifting priorities, emergencies, PTO/OOO/Holidays, etc.
You may want to do a work-back exercise: Starting from your target go-live deadline, work backwards to block out how much time is needed for: training, QA/UAT, organizational change management, communication, configuration, etc. Your implementation consultant can help guide you on typical timelines for different areas of configuration and provide reasonable first-guess estimates.
What critical processes need to be represented in TDX?
You may also want to review your processes and decide which ones are "must-haves" to build out in your TeamDynamix system prior to go-live, and which ones are "should-haves" that can wait until after your go-live. How well defined are those critical processes? Do you need to spend additional time or discussion to develop your process more thoroughly? Be sure to incorporate any additional time needed for process development into your planned scope above.
Examples of common critical processes for service management:
Resources:
How do you want to deploy TDX to your stakeholders?
In addition to planning out your availability, resources, and timing for configuration, it's important to start planning your overall deployment strategy early. Your go-live is not only technical changes like a new system, new interface, and potentially new processes... but also an organizational and political change: the way people work, request help, access resources, and interface with your services will all be different. Change is scary! Planning out your deployment process early will help make those changes be accepted and integrated into your organization and give you opportunities to respond empathetically to negative reactions throughout the process.
Review your communications plans and work with resources in your organization to identify the best ways to manage communications about your implementation early and often. You may want to ask your HR department, PMO, or other similar departments to get tailored advice about what strategic key points should be considered when developing a communications plan for your specific organization's needs.
Think about what other outreach or deployment activities you may want to add into your deployment plan. Do you want to do user demos? A go-live party for the implementation team? Town hall discussions with stakeholders? Internal advertising and messaging on signage? Training or peer support forums? Email status updates to leadership? Think about the different stakeholder groups you want to engage, and the best way to manage the narrative about the implementation that you provide to those stakeholder groups.